Blurbs

About Me

Miscellaneous.

Posts

Displaying 1 of 1 pages. View all

June 26 2012 10:25 PM · 3 notes

This is why Photoshop is bad.
So GQ’s newest edition has Kate Upton on the cover. The Sports Illustrated swimsuit edition did too. However, GQ’s is about a million times better — mainly because she looks like a person is supposed to look.
Kate Upton is a ridiculously good looking lady (in my opinion.) So I was pretty displeased when I got this year’s SI swimsuit edition, because she looks bizarre. Her face looks totally unnatural and smushed. Compare to the GQ cover, and it’s like a different person.
Even if you avoid the boobs — cover them up with your hand, and look. Which looks better? Of course, the popsicle is trying to suggest something, but you can cover that up too, and it’s just a much better picture.
This is why you should use Photoshop sparingly, or at least subtly.

This is why Photoshop is bad.

So GQ’s newest edition has Kate Upton on the cover. The Sports Illustrated swimsuit edition did too. However, GQ’s is about a million times better — mainly because she looks like a person is supposed to look.

Kate Upton is a ridiculously good looking lady (in my opinion.) So I was pretty displeased when I got this year’s SI swimsuit edition, because she looks bizarre. Her face looks totally unnatural and smushed. Compare to the GQ cover, and it’s like a different person.

Even if you avoid the boobs — cover them up with your hand, and look. Which looks better? Of course, the popsicle is trying to suggest something, but you can cover that up too, and it’s just a much better picture.

This is why you should use Photoshop sparingly, or at least subtly.

Tags gq kate upton photoshop rant sports illustrated terry richardson

  1. everygoodusernameistaken posted this

Tags gq

Tags kate upton

Tags photoshop

Tags rant

Tags sports illustrated

Tags terry richardson